24/7 Operational Effectiveness Toolset: Predictions of FAST™ and F-PAS Compared

http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA501640&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
24/7 Operational Effectiveness Toolset: Predictions of FAST™ and F-PAS Compared

AFRL-RH-BR-TR-2009-0034

Douglas R. Eddy and Juan Mendez
2008

The purpose of the work reported here was to validate the core software components of a new web-based version of the Fatigue Avoidance Scheduling Tool (FAST™). Four different schedules were used to compare the performance effectiveness projections of the two computer applications. The methods used to compare the data were taken from Chaiken (2005). The preliminary comparisons revealed discrepancies between the applications that were unacceptable. After modifications to the Core Software, an additional validation was conducted. The second comparison resulted in excellent agreement between the web-based Core Software and FAST™. The two tools allow users to predict cognitive performance effectiveness based on the timing and amount of sleep an individual or team receives prior to and during a mission. They provide the military planner the ability to optimize performance under conditions of limited sleep, thus minimizing the need for pharmacological aids while indicating work periods where additional fatigue countermeasures may be necessary.
With the validation of the Core Software, the new web-based tool was enhanced with new user interfaces for mishap investigation, shift work scheduling, mission scheduling, AMC pilot rescheduling after an interrupted mission, and AF flight surgeon fatigue countermeasures applications reported elsewhere. The web-based tool is called the Fatigue-Performance Assessment System (F-PAS).
15. SUBJECT TERMS
Fatigue management, Cognitive performance, Sleep, Circadian Rhythm, Verification, Validation and Accreditation